T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund (PRFSX)
Ticker Symbol:
Fund Status:
Open to new Retail investors  /  Open to subsequent Retail investments
Fund Management
Fund Manager
  • Charles B. Hill
  • Managed Fund Since: 01/31/1995
  • Joined Firm On 12/02/1991*
  • B.S., Guilford College

*Firm refers to T. Rowe Price Associates and Affiliates
Quarterly Commentaries
as of 06/30/2015

Tax-free municipal bonds edged lower in the second quarter of 2015 but held up better than taxable bonds. Munis fell with Treasuries in response to rising long-term interest rates, a strengthening economy, and concerns that the Federal Reserve, which kept short-term rates steady during the quarter, would begin raising them sometime in 2015. Light issuance and solid demand for tax-free income provided support for the municipal market. Lower-quality and longer-maturity municipal bonds lagged higher-quality and shorter-term issues, respectively. Late in the quarter, bonds issued by Puerto Rico, a major muni issuer, fell sharply following an acknowledgement by its governor that the commonwealth's debt was "not payable."

The Tax-Free Short-Intermediate Fund returned −0.36% in the quarter compared with −0.07% for the Barclays 1−5 Year Blend (1−6 Year Maturity) Index and −0.54% for the Lipper Short-Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds Average. For the 12 months ended June 30, 2015, the fund returned 0.42% versus 0.84% for the Barclays 1−5 Year Blend (1−6 Year Maturity) Index and 0.45% for the Lipper Short-Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds Average. The fund's average annual total returns were 0.42%, 1.91%, and 2.88% for the 1-, 5-, and 10-year periods, respectively, as of June 30, 2015. The fund's expense ratio was 0.49% as of its fiscal year ended February 28, 2015.

For up-to-date standardized total returns, including the most recent month-end performance, please click on the Performance tab, above.
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will vary and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares.

Benchmark Definitions

We prefer revenue bonds in general because they offer the relative security of specific claims on revenues versus the generic pledges of taxing power associated with general obligation bonds. While the portfolio's overweight allocation in the health care sector benefited its performance relative to the benchmark, security selection within the sector weighed on relative performance. We had a modest position in 10-year bonds, which are not included in the benchmark, that hurt our relative performance. The fund's duration, which is a measure of sensitivity to interest rate changes, was longer than the benchmark's duration. This positioning detracted from relative returns as yields increased. As always, we focus on finding attractively valued bonds issued by municipalities with good long-term fundamentals.

We believe that the municipal bond market remains a high-quality market that offers good opportunities for long-term investors seeking tax-free income. While fundamentals are sound overall and technical support should persist, there could be hurdles later in 2015. In particular, with the Fed preparing to tighten monetary policy, we are mindful that rising rates would likely weaken the appetite for bonds with higher interest rate risk. However, with the Fed likely to act cautiously, the transition to higher rates may not be as painful as some fear. Ultimately, we believe T. Rowe Price's independent credit research is our greatest strength and will remain an asset for our investors as we navigate the current market environment.

See Glossary for additional details on all data elements.